KONTINUIraNa MEdICINsKa PraKsa Etiopatogeneza, dijagnostika, stejdžing i preoperativna priprema pacijenata sa karcinomom želuca

Dejan Stevanović Orcid logo ,
Dejan Stevanović
Sanja M. Milenković
Sanja M. Milenković

Published: 01.12.2011.

Biochemistry

Volume 28, Issue 1 (2012)

pp. 424-431;

https://doi.org/10.5937/matmed1201424s

Abstract

Keywords

References

1.
Tio T. Preoperative classification of gastric carcinoma by endosonographic on comparasion with patologic TNM system. Hepatogastoenetrology. 1989;51–6.
2.
Nasierowska-Guttmeyer A. Immunohistochemical detection of CEa in Non-cancerous and Cancerous gastric mucosa. Int j Biol Markers. 1989;(1):8–12.
3.
Kusela P, Haglund C, Roberts Pj. Comparation od new tumour marker Ca 242 with Ca 19-9, Ca 50 and CEa in digestive tract disease. Br j Cancer. 1991;636–40.
4.
Ziegler K, Zimmer C, T. Compration od computerized tomography, endosonography and intraoperative assessment in TNM staging of gastric carcinoma. Gastroentrology. 1993;604–10.
5.
Goh M. role of laparoscopy in the menagment of stomach cancer. seminar in surgical oncology. 1999;321–6.
6.
Mc Near G, Vandenberg H. a critical evaluation of subtotal gastrectomy for cure of stomach cancer. annals of surgery. 1951;2–7.
7.
Gilbertsen V. results of treatment of stomach cancer: an apprasial of effort for more extensive surgery and report of 1983 cases. Cancer. 1969;1305–8.
8.
Maruyama K, Gunven P. Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer. am surg. 1990;(5):596–602.
9.
Maruyama K. The most important prognostic factors for gastric cancer patients. a study using univariate and multivariate analysis. 1987;63–8.
10.
Noguchi Y, Imada T. radical suregery for gastric cancer.a review of the japanese expirience. Cancer. 1989;253–62.
11.
Ohiamax a. statistical evaluation of advacement in gastric cancer surgery with special reference to the significance of lymphadenectomy for cure. Word j.surgery. 1988;398–405.
12.
Iriyama K, Koike H. Is extensive lymphadenectomy necessery for surgical treatment of intramucosal carcinoma of the stomach ? arch of surgery. 1989;309–11.
13.
japanese research society Commitee on Phistopathological Classification for Gastric Cancer: The general rules for the gastric cancer study in surgery and pathology.Part II. jpn j surg. 1981;140–5.
14.
japanise research society for Gastric Cancer: The general rules for the gastric cancer study in surgery and pathology. Part I . Clinical klassifications. jpn j surg. 1981;127–239.
15.
Deng J, Liang H, Pan Y, Liu Y, Wang. Extended lymphadenectomy improvement of overall survival of gastric cancer patients with perigastric node metastasis. Langenbecks arch surg. 2011;(5):615–23.
16.
Wang Z, Jq C, Cao Y. systematic review of d2 lymphadenectomy versus d2 with para-aortic nodal dissection for advanced gastric cancer. World j Gastroenterol. 2010;(9):1138–49.
17.
Ielpo B, Buonomo E, O, Ld V, Petrella E, G, et al. Impact of number and site of lymph node invasion on survival of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac surg. 2010;(5):704–8.
18.
Putchakayala K, Difronzo L. d2 lymph node dissection improves staging inpatients with gastric adenocarcinoma. am surg. 2011;(10):1326–9.
19.
Saka M, Morita, Fukagawa T, Katai H. Present and future status of gastric cancer surgery. jpn j Clin Oncol. 2011;(3):307–13.
20.
2010;73–7.
21.
japanese Gastric Cancer association. japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011;101–12.
22.
japanese Gastric Cancer association. japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011;113–23.

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Partners